Warning for Redtube-Videos - do I have to pay?
A generally valid answer to this. In the case of Redtube warned the Regensburg firm Urmann and colleagues (U+C) , and estimated the value in dispute of around € 1,000 per Clip plus attorney's fees. Usually, the following applies:
- The demands of the lawyers-law firms are covered in the rule and the legal basis is not clear.
- You are not in a position to respond to the warning, could drag the firm to court.
- Therefore, you should react to the warning, first with a request for an extension of the deadline, in order to gain time. A pattern template can be found here to Download; at best, you are sending the document by registered mail.
I have the cease and desist letter to sign?
- With the fee warning you also get a cease and desist. This you should definitely not sign and the help of the explanations for the clients and they have too many rights. For example, a high penalty threatens them when re-Clicking on the warned party Clips.
- In any case, you should make, instead, a so-called "modified Declaration to cease and desist". Either, you let a lawyer write (but without legal protection insurance, in turn, costs) or the consumer center for advice.
- Or mail - at your own risk, without legal advice, a modified Declaration to cease and desist on the Basis of one of the numerous templates that exist on the Internet. A sample letter can be found in the Loggi Leaks Forum.
- In any case, you should contact the law firm Urmann and colleagues to telephone contact.
- Also, the modified Declaration to cease and desist sending you by registered mail with acknowledgement of receipt; in the case of a very short Deadline in advance by Fax or Email.
Abmahnungs-will pay a claim or not?
The crucial question, whether you should pay for the U+C amounts, we can not answer here is binding; for that, you should be in doubt, in any case, the lawyer or the consumer advice.
- What are the consequences of it in the case of Non-payment to expect , you can in this article on the topic of file sharing warning letter read.
Porn-Streaming - the legal position
- Currently, lawyers will discuss whether Video Streaming is already a copyright violation or not, The Streaming of short sequences are stored in a temporary folder and then automatically deleted. The full Film is not so copied to the hard disk. Court decisions are not available yet.
- In order for a claim for damages can be asserted, there must be an "obviously illegal source".
- "Manifestly unlawful" is a page with content that is normally only available at a cost, for example, the Top 100 Single-Charts.
- In the case of "Redtube" is also the way how the IP addresses of the warned party were collected, is very dubious: It is suspected that the victims were lured with a so-called Honeypot on the Redtube Website. May could be prosecuted the person responsible, even legally.
Free Initial Consultation (Display)
Under 0221 / 40 06 75 54 44 get you right ask the help of the legal experts of the law firm Wilde scaffolding Solmecke. (Call to the fixed network price, mobile if necessary. by way of derogation).
- In our form you can , without obligation, a free consultation request.
By The way: Redtube-warning shaft has also been some occurs caused Board driver to the Plan, the Trojan-infested, Phishing-Mails. As you can take to protect yourself, read here.
